ARTIST:
TRACK:
ALBUM:
191,217 plays
POSTED July 27, 2014 @ 23:40 WITH 29,465 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: freezeveganpolice (SOURCE: monettes)

riotsiren:

Next older person to complain about millennials has to pay off a random 20-something’s student loans

POSTED July 27, 2014 @ 23:21 WITH 17,661 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: theirtroublesareboring (SOURCE: riotsiren)
mattressblowoutsale:

storeboughtisfine:

i’d like to think this the humans of new york guy’s mortal enemy and this confrontation ended in a street brawl

"what took you so long"

mattressblowoutsale:

storeboughtisfine:

i’d like to think this the humans of new york guy’s mortal enemy and this confrontation ended in a street brawl

"what took you so long"

POSTED July 27, 2014 @ 03:25 WITH 1,727 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: bubonickitten (SOURCE: storeboughtisfine)

traceexcalibur:

I smell trouble brewing

POSTED July 26, 2014 @ 22:53 WITH 28,257 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: bubonickitten (SOURCE: traceexcalibur)

But the 8-hour workday is too profitable for big business, not because of the amount of work people get done in eight hours (the average office worker gets less than three hours of actual work done in 8 hours) but because it makes for such a purchase-happy public. Keeping free time scarce means people pay a lot more for convenience, gratification, and any other relief they can buy. It keeps them watching television, and its commercials. It keeps them unambitious outside of work.

We’ve been led into a culture that has been engineered to leave us tired, hungry for indulgence, willing to pay a lot for convenience and entertainment, and most importantly, vaguely dissatisfied with our lives so that we continue wanting things we don’t have. We buy so much because it always seems like something is still missing.

POSTED July 26, 2014 @ 03:26 WITH 50,042 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: platanosandprejudice (SOURCE: beccap)

I believe that the current limits on press freedom and excessive government secrecy make it impossible for Americans to grasp fully what is happening in the wars we finance.

 -

Chelsea Manning

She went on to criticize the structural flaws in media coverage of US wars, stating:

One clue to this disjunction lay in the public affairs reports. Near the top of each briefing was the number of embedded journalists attached to American military units in a combat zone. Throughout my deployment, I never saw that tally go above 12. In other words, in all of Iraq, which contained 31 million people and 117,000 United States troops, no more than a dozen American journalists were covering military operations.

The process of limiting press access to a conflict begins when a reporter applies for embed status. All reporters are carefully vetted by military public affairs officials. This system is far from unbiased. Unsurprisingly, reporters who have established relationships with the military are more likely to be granted access.

Less well known is that journalists whom military contractors rate as likely to produce “favorable” coverage, based on their past reporting, also get preference. This outsourced “favorability” rating assigned to each applicant is used to screen out those judged likely to produce critical coverage.

Reporters who succeeded in obtaining embed status in Iraq were then required to sign a media “ground rules” agreement. Army public affairs officials said this was to protect operational security, but it also allowed them to terminate a reporter’s embed without appeal.

There have been numerous cases of reporters’ having their access terminated following controversial reporting. In 2010, the late Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings had his access pulled after reporting criticism of the Obama administration by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal and his staff in Afghanistan. A Pentagon spokesman said, “Embeds are a privilege, not a right.”

If a reporter’s embed status is terminated, typically she or he is blacklisted.” 

(via america-wakiewakie)

pervocracy:

cleolinda:

cinematicnomad:

apparently e.l. james called former child star mara wilson (matilda) a “sad fuck” for critiquing the 50shades books a while ago and now there’s a feud. i love it.

I’m in on this feud and I have chosen my side.

MARA WILSON, YOU HAVE MY SWORD.

POSTED July 25, 2014 @ 17:55 WITH 150,880 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: freezeveganpolice (SOURCE: cinematicnomad)

linguisticsyall:

lucithor:

WHY WAS I UNAWARE OF THE FACT THAT “DISGRUNTLED” IS, IN FACT, THE OPPOSITE OF “GRUNTLED”

image

WHY DOES NOBODY USE THIS WORD

I’m so gruntled to have found this

POSTED July 25, 2014 @ 16:32 WITH 147,118 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: thepoliticalfreakshow (SOURCE: lucithor)
inconsolable-grief:

PBS is that older brother you used to idolize before he made a few big mistakes and set-backs and now you’re really rooting for his recovery, even through the little embarrassments like this

inconsolable-grief:

PBS is that older brother you used to idolize before he made a few big mistakes and set-backs and now you’re really rooting for his recovery, even through the little embarrassments like this

POSTED July 25, 2014 @ 13:17 WITH 164 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: afternoonsnoozebutton (SOURCE: inconsolable-grief)

nosdrinker:

420core:

good

the reptilians have seized control

POSTED July 25, 2014 @ 09:48 WITH 76,782 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: duessa (SOURCE: Washington Post)

As an ultimate fuck you to rule-keeping scripture zealots everywhere, Jesus hung out with whores. Embracing whores was a double rebuke to the Jewish scripture-thumpers because it put Jesus on the side of the pagan, prostitute-condoning Roman occupiers and made him a traitor in the culture wars of the day. Yet, the anointing of Jesus by a prostitute is one of the few events reported in all four gospels. As Jesus blessed and defended her, Matthew’s gospel says the disciples “were indignant” while Luke describes the woman who did the anointing as “a woman in that town who lived a sinful life,” which is a coded phrase for a filthy hooker who is certainly not one of us. Jesus’ embrace of a woman from an enemy tribe in a culture where tribal belonging was paramount distressed both his followers and enemies. His attitude to the “other” was as incomprehensible as if he’d blurted “E=mc2 is the equation of mass–energy equivalence.

POSTED July 24, 2014 @ 20:34 WITH 386 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: reagan-was-a-horrible-president (SOURCE: patheos.com)

iguanamouth:

youre gonna look so godamn cool

POSTED July 24, 2014 @ 10:17 WITH 211,883 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: theirtroublesareboring (SOURCE: iguanamouth)

aslytherininthetardis:

The Cry of the Icemark | Unofficial Trailer [HD] | 20th Century Fox 

So my sister and I were looking through some old books on a bookshelf in our basement, and we stumbled upon a very worn copy of The Cry of Icemark by Stuart Hill, which is a book we absolutely loved growing up. After rereading it, we really thought it would make a terrific movie. We did some research and found that 20th Century Fox actually acquired the film rights, but the movie adaptation never moved forward. 

Consider this fanmade trailer our movie pitch, and a pitch to people who haven’t read the book to give it a try.  It is difficult to find high quality fantasy novels, and this is definitely among the very few. It is a book that is exceedingly progressive for its time and just a fantastic adventure. 

Here’s a quick summary: 

After the death of her father, Princess Thirrin becomes the warrior queen of her small homeland, the Icemark, and must defend it from a formidable invader, the Polypontian Empire and its undefeated general Scipio Bellorum. To stand a chance of defeating an empire that has conquered much of the known world, she must assemble a force to rival her opponent. And, in the chill winter of the Icemark, she only has until spring to find allies in the strange beasts and frightening creatures who live to the north. 

For ease of editing, we fancast Sophie Turner as Queen Thirrin, George Blagden as her young advisor Oskan, and Christian Bale as Scipio Bellorum. 

Please read the book and/or let us know what you think of the trailer!

AND NOW I’M REALLY EMOTIONAL

The U.S. media coverage of the Israeli occupation and invasion of Gaza is grossly biased against Palestinians. The litmus test should be what would U.S. media coverage look like of a nearly 50 year Palestinian occupation of downtrodden Jews or massive Palestinian military massacres of innocent Jewish men, women and children in homes and hospitals backed by U.S. politicians, money and military technology?

Our moral and political response to the actual Israeli occupation and invasion should be the same as that of a non-existent Palestinian occupation and invasion. Our righteous indignation at the murder of hundreds of Palestinian babies should be the same as that of the murder of Jewish babies. Let us not forget that ugly war crimes of any occupying power always outstrip those of the occupied, yet every human life is precious and resistance to occupation is inevitable.

POSTED July 23, 2014 @ 23:15 WITH 112 notes
REBLOGGED FROM: america-wakiewakie